| |
Acute pyelonephritis is a bacterial infection of the kidney that
causes an acute suppurative tubulo-interstitial inflammation of
the renal parenchyma. It primarily results from an ascending infection
from the lower urinary tract, typically due to gram negative enteric
pathogens (e.g. E. coli, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
and Klebsiella spp.). Conditions that predispose patients with lower
urinary tract infections to renal involvement include: vesicoureteral
reflux, urinary tract obstruction, calculi, altered bladder function,
altered host resistance, pregnancy, and congenital urinary tract
anomalies. In small number of patients, acute pyelonephrtitis can
be caused by hematogenous seeding (septic emboli) of the kidney
secondary to intravenous drug abuse, subacute bacterial endocarditis,
or from a distant primary focus e.g. tooth abscess, respiratory
tract infection. More than 90% of these types of renal infections
are caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus. Acute pyelonephritis
can be of varying severity, which can range from uncomplicated to
progressively worsening stages of interstitial inflammation to frank
abscess formation. Women under the age of 50 years are more commonly
affected by acute pyelonephritis than men. Over the age of 50, the
incidence of acute pyelonephritis in men increases as a result of
urinary stasis secondary to benign prostatic hypertrophy and other
factors. Patients often present with fever, chills, flank pain,
pyruia, nausea, vomiting, and malaise.
In the majority of cases, the diagnosis of acute pyleonephritis
in adults can be based on clinical and laboratory findings and quick
response to antibiotics is the rule. Routine renal imaging is generally
not indicated in uncomplicated bacterial pyelonephritis in adults.
Imaging in adult patients is indicated for the following cases:
- Adult patients who respond poorly to appropriate antibiotic
therapy after 3 days.
- When a definite diagnosis of acute renal infection is not established.
- When patients present with recurrent episodes of infection.
In these cases renal imaging is indicated because of an increased
likelihood of stones, obstruction, abscess, or congenital anomaly.
- Patients with history of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus,
AIDS, organ transplants or other immunocompromised diseased states.
In these patients imaging may be required initially because there
is an increased risk of developing a complicated acute renal infection
including a renal or perinephric abscess.
The primary goal of renal imaging is to provide information regarding
the nature and extent of disease process and to identify significant
complications (e.g. gas-forming infection, abscess, and urinary
obstruction) and predisposing abnormalities (e.g. obstruction and
calculi). This information helps to guide immediate intervention
and appropriate antimicrobial treatment. The reported results of
MR imaging for the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis are promising
from both animal studies and from clinical studies in pediatric
patients. Clinical experience in adults is still limited. MRI can
be used in evaluating adult patients with suspected acute pyelonephritis
who have contraindications to iodinated contrast material. MR findings
of acute pyelonephritis include a striated nephrogram that radiates
from the renal medulla to the cortex, globular renal enlargement,
and perinephric fluid. Acute pyelonephritis is best demonstrated
after contrast material administration and with fast inversion recovery
or T2-weighted pulse sequences. The affected areas have persistent
increased signal intensity on these images compared with the normal
renal parenchyma, which becomes lower in signal intensity after
administration of contrast material. Perinephric fluid may be observed,
which is best shown on post-gadolinium images. Proteinaceous material
in the renal tubules may occasionally be visualized as high signal
intensity substance in the renal medulla on non-contrast T1-weighted
fat-suppressed images. It should be noted that gas, calculi, and
blood flow appear as areas of signal void on MRI and may be indistinguishable.
References:
- Semelka, Richard. Abdominal-Pelvic MRI. New York: Wiley-Liss
Inc, 2002. pp. 830-832.
- Dunnick NR, Sandler CM, Newhouse JH, and ES Amis. Textbook of
Uroradiology, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, c2001. pp. 150-151.
- Rickhardt PJ, Lonergan GJ, Davis FJ, Kashitani N, and BJ Wagner.
Infiltrative Renal Lesions: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.
RadioGraphics. 2000; 20: 215-243.
- Kawashima A, Sandler CM, and SM Goldman. Imaging in Acute
Renal Infection. British Journal of Urology International.
2000; 86 (Suppl.): 70-79.
- Kawashima A. and A.J. LeRoy. Radiologic Evaluation of Patients
with Renal Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North
America. 2003; 17(2): 433-456.
|
|