Biosketch / Results /
Lisa A Dailey, Ph.D.
Associate Professor;Department of Microbiology (Microbiology )
Contact Info
Address
550 First Avenue
Floor 2 Room 207 & 252
Medical Science Building
New York,
NY
10016
212-263-5331
212-263-8714
Lisa.Dailey@med.nyu.edu
All data from NYU Health Sciences Library Faculty Bibliography — -
Contact:
http://hsl.med.nyu.edu/faculty-bibliography-search#about
Construction of gene/transcription regulatory networks
Dailey, Lisa
2010 Jan;9(1):1-3, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics
—
id: 107751,
year: 2010,
vol: 9,
page: 1,
stat: Journal Article,
Identification of active transcriptional regulatory modules by the functional assay of DNA from nucleosome-free regions
Yaragatti, Mahesh; Basilico, Claudio; Dailey, Lisa
2008 Jun;18(6):930-938, Genome research
The identification of transcriptional regulatory modules within mammalian genomes is a prerequisite to understanding the mechanisms controlling regulated gene expression. While high-throughput microarray- and sequencing-based approaches have been used to map the genomic locations of sites of nuclease hypersensitivity or target DNA sequences bound by specific protein factors, the identification of regulatory elements using functional assays, which would provide important complementary data, has been relatively rare. Here we present a method that permits the functional identification of active transcriptional regulatory modules using a simple procedure for the isolation and analysis of DNA derived from nucleosome-free regions (NFRs), the 2% of the cellular genome that contains these elements. The more than 100 new active regulatory DNAs identified in this manner from F9 cells correspond to both promoter-proximal and distal elements, and display several features predicted for endogenous transcriptional regulators, including localization within DNase-accessible chromatin and CpG islands, and proximity to expressed genes. Furthermore, comparison with published ChIP-seq data of ES-cell chromatin shows that the functional elements we identified correspond with genomic regions enriched for H3K4me3, a histone modification associated with active transcriptional regulatory elements, and that the correspondence of H3K4me3 with our promoter-distal elements is largely ES-cell specific. The majority of the distal elements exhibit enhancer activity. Importantly, these functional DNA fragments are an average 149 bp in length, greatly facilitating future applications to identify transcription factor binding sites mediating their activity. Thus, this approach provides a tool for the high-resolution identification of the functional components of active promoters and enhancers
—
id: 80304,
year: 2008,
vol: 18,
page: 930,
stat: Journal Article,
Downregulation of Akt activity contributes to the growth arrest induced by FGF in chondrocytes
Priore, Riccardo; Dailey, Lisa; Basilico, Claudio
2006 Jun;207(3):800-808, Journal of cellular physiology
Unregulated FGF signaling produced by activating FGFR3 mutations causes several forms of dwarfism-associated chondrodysplasias in humans and mice. FGF signaling inhibits chondrocyte proliferation by activating multiple signal transduction pathways that all contribute to chondrocyte growth arrest and induction of some aspects of differentiation. Previous studies had identified the Stat1 pathway, dephosphorylation of the Rb family proteins p107 and p130, induction of p21 expression and sustained activation of MAP kinases as playing a role in the FGF response of chondrocytes. We have examined the role of Akt (PKB) in the response of chondrocytes to FGF signaling. Differently from what is observed in many other cell types, FGF does not activate Akt in chondrocytes, and Akt phosphorylation is actually downregulated after FGF treatment. By expressing a constitutively activated, myristylated form of Akt (myr-Akt) in the RCS chondrosarcoma cell line, we show that Akt activation partially counteracts the inhibitory effect of FGF signaling. The response of myr-Akt expressing cells to FGF is identical to parental RCS in the first few hours after treatment, but then diverges as myr-Akt cells show decreased p130 phosphorylation, increased cyclin E/cdk2 activity and continue to proliferate at a slow rate. Constitutive Akt activation does not affect p21 expression but appears to influence directly cdk/cyclin activity. On the other hand, the induction of differentiation-related genes is unchanged in myr-Akt cells. These results identify Akt downregulation as an important aspect of the response of chondrocytes to FGF that, however, only affects chondrocyte proliferation and not the ability of FGF to induce differentiation genes
—
id: 64470,
year: 2006,
vol: 207,
page: 800,
stat: Journal Article,
Mechanisms underlying differential responses to FGF signaling
Dailey, Lisa; Ambrosetti, Davide; Mansukhani, Alka; Basilico, Claudio
2005 Apr;16(2):233-247, Cytokine & growth factor reviews
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are key regulators of several developmental processes in which cell fate and differentiation to various tissue lineages are determined. The importance of the proper spatial and temporal regulation of FGF signals is evident from human and mouse genetic studies which show that mutations leading to the dysregulation of FGF signals cause a variety of developmental disorders including dominant skeletal diseases and cancer. The FGF ligands signal via a family of receptor tyrosine kinases and, depending on the cell type or stage of maturation, produce diverse biological responses that include proliferation, growth arrest, differentiation or apoptosis. A central issue in FGF biology is to understand how these diverse cellular responses are determined and how similar signaling inputs can generate distinct patterns of gene expression that govern the specificity of the cellular response. In this review we draw upon studies from the past fifteen years and attempt to construct a molecular picture of the different levels of regulation by which such specific cellular responses could be achieved by FGF signals. We discuss whether specificity could lie in the nature of the ligand, the particular receptor, the signal transduction pathways utilized, or the transcriptional regulation of specific genes. Finally, we also discuss how the interplay of FGF signals with other signaling systems could contribute to the cellular response. In particular we focus on the interaction with the Wnt pathway since FGF/Wnt cross-talk is emerging as an important nexus in regulating a variety of biological processes
—
id: 55971,
year: 2005,
vol: 16,
page: 233,
stat: Journal Article,
FGF signaling initiates multiple pathways to induce growth arrest and promote hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes
Dailey, L; LaPlantine, E; Priore, R; Basilico, C
2003 MAY ;32(5):S144-S144, Bone
—
id: 38552,
year: 2003,
vol: 32,
page: S144,
stat: Journal Article,
A network of transcriptional and signaling events is activated by FGF to induce chondrocyte growth arrest and differentiation
Dailey, Lisa; Laplantine, Emmanuel; Priore, Riccardo; Basilico, Claudio
2003 Jun 23;161(6):1053-1066, Journal of cell biology
Activating mutations in FGF receptor 3 (FGFR3) cause several human dwarfism syndromes by affecting both chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Using microarray and biochemical analyses of FGF-treated rat chondrosarcoma chondrocytes, we show that FGF inhibits chondrocyte proliferation by initiating multiple pathways that result in the induction of antiproliferative functions and the down-regulation of growth-promoting molecules. The initiation of growth arrest is characterized by the rapid dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) p107 and repression of a subset of E2F target genes by a mechanism that is independent of cyclin E-Cdk inhibition. In contrast, hypophosphorylation of pRb and p130 occur after growth arrest is first detected, and may contribute to its maintenance. Importantly, we also find a number of gene expression changes indicating that FGF promotes many aspects of hypertrophic differentiation, a notion supported by in situ analysis of developing growth plates from mice expressing an activated form of FGFR3. Thus, FGF may coordinate the onset of differentiation with chondrocyte growth arrest in the developing growth plate
—
id: 39184,
year: 2003,
vol: 161,
page: 1053,
stat: Journal Article,
Coevolution of HMG domains and homeodomains and the generation of transcriptional regulation by Sox/POU complexes
Dailey L; Basilico C
2001 Mar;186(3):315-328, Journal of cellular physiology
The highly conserved homeodomains and HMG domains are components of a large number of proteins that play a role in the transcriptional regulation of gene expression during embryogenesis. Both the HMG domain and the homeodomain serve as interfaces for factor interactions with DNA, as well as with other proteins, and it is likely that the high degree of structural and sequence conservation within these domains reflects the conservation of basic aspects of these interactions. Classical HMG domain proteins have an ancient origin, being found in all eukaryotes, and are thought to have given rise to the metazoan-specific class of HMG domain proteins called the Sox proteins. Similarly, the metazoan-specific POU domain proteins are thought to have arisen from genes encoding ancestral homeodomain proteins. In this review, we summarize several examples of different HMG-homeodomain interactions that illustrate not only the ancient origin of each of these protein families, but also their relationship to each other, and discuss how coevolution of HMG and homeodomains may have lead to creation of the specialized Sox/POU protein complexes. Using the FGF-4 gene as an example, we also speculate on how coevolution of regulatory Sox/POU target DNA sequences may have occurred, and how the summation of these changes may have lead to the emergence of new developmental pathways
—
id: 26799,
year: 2001,
vol: 186,
page: 315,
stat: Journal Article,
Modulation of the activity of multiple transcriptional activation domains by the DNA binding domains mediates the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3 on the fibroblast growth factor-4 enhancer
Ambrosetti DC; Scholer HR; Dailey L; Basilico C
2000 Jul 28;275(30):23387-23397, Journal of biological chemistry
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-4 gene expression in the inner cell mass of the blastocyst and in EC cells requires the combined activity of two transcriptional regulators, Sox2 and Oct-3, which bind to adjacent sites on the FGF-4 enhancer DNA and synergistically activate transcription. Sox2 and Oct-3 bind cooperatively to the enhancer DNA through their DNA-binding, high mobility group and POU domains, respectively. These two domains, however, are not sufficient to activate transcription. We have analyzed a number of Sox2 and Oct-3 deletion mutants to identify the domains within each protein that contribute to the activity of the Sox2 x Oct-3 complex. Within Oct-3, we have identified two activation domains, the N-terminal AD1 and the C-terminal AD2, that play a role in the activity of the Sox2 x Oct-3 complex. AD1 also displays transcriptional activation functions in the absence of Sox2 while AD2 function was only detected within the Sox2 x Oct-3 complex. In Sox2, we have identified three activation domains within its C terminus: R1, R2, and R3. R1 and R2 can potentiate weak activation by Sox2 in the absence of Oct-3 but their deletion has no effect on the Sox2 x Oct-3 complex. In contrast, R3 function is only observed when Sox2 is complexed with Oct-3. In addition, analysis of Oct-1/Oct-3 chimeras indicates that the Oct-3 homeodomain also plays a critical role in the formation of a functional Sox2 x Oct-3 complex. Our results are consistent with a model in which the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3 results from two major processes. Cooperative binding of the factors to the enhancer DNA, mediated by their binding domains, stably tethers each factor to DNA and increases the activity of intrinsic activation domains within each protein. Protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions then may lead to reciprocal conformational changes that expose latent activation domains within each protein. These findings define a mechanism that may also be utilized by other Sox x POU protein complexes in gene activation
—
id: 11713,
year: 2000,
vol: 275,
page: 23387,
stat: Journal Article,
Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites
Ambrosetti DC; Basilico C; Dailey L
1997 Nov;17(11):6321-6329, Molecular & cellular biology
Octamer binding and Sox factors are thought to play important roles in development by potentiating the transcriptional activation of specific gene subsets. The proteins within these factor families are related by the presence of highly conserved DNA binding domains, the octamer binding protein POU domain or the Sox factors HMG domain. We have previously shown that fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene expression in embryonal carcinoma cells requires a synergistic interaction between Oct-3 and Sox2 on the FGF-4 enhancer. Sox2 and Oct-3 bind to adjacent sites within this enhancer to form a ternary protein-DNA complex (Oct-3*) whose assembly correlates with enhancer activity. We now demonstrate that increasing the distance between the octamer and Sox binding sites by base pair insertion results in a loss of enhancer function. Significantly, those enhancer 'spacing mutants' which failed to activate transcription were also compromised in their ability to form the Oct* complexes even though they could still bind both Sox2 and the octamer binding proteins, suggesting that a direct interaction between Sox2 and Oct-3 is necessary for enhancer function. Consistent with this hypothesis, Oct-3 and Sox2 can participate in a direct protein-protein interaction in vitro in the absence of DNA, and both this interaction and assembly of the ternary Oct* complexes require only the octamer protein POU and Sox2 HMG domains. Assembly of the ternary complex by these two protein domains occurs in a cooperative manner on FGF-4 enhancer DNA, and the loss of this cooperative interaction contributes to the defect in Oct-3* formation observed for the enhancer spacing mutants. These observations indicate that Oct-3* assembly results from protein-protein interactions between the domains of Sox2 and Oct-3 that mediate their binding to DNA, but it also requires a specific arrangement of the binding sites within the FGF-4 enhancer DNA. Thus, these results define one parameter that is fundamental to synergistic activation by Sox2 and Oct-3 and further emphasize the critical role of enhancer DNA sequences in the proper assembly of functional activation complexes
—
id: 12266,
year: 1997,
vol: 17,
page: 6321,
stat: Journal Article,
Regulatory mechanisms governing FGF-4 gene expression during mouse development
Basilico C; Ambrosetti D; Fraidenraich D; Dailey L
1997 Nov;173(2):227-232, Journal of cellular physiology
—
id: 12227,
year: 1997,
vol: 173,
page: 227,
stat: Journal Article,
Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3
Yuan H; Corbi N; Basilico C; Dailey L
1995 Nov 1;9(21):2635-2645, Genes & development
Fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) has been shown to be a signaling molecule whose expression is essential for postimplantation mouse development and, at later embryonic stages, for limb patterning and growth. The FGF-4 gene is expressed in the blastocyst inner cell mass and later in distinct embryonic tissues but is transcriptionally silent in the adult. In tissue culture FGF-4 expression is restricted to undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells and embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell lines. Previously, we determined that EC cell-specific transcriptional activation of the FGF-4 gene depends on a synergistic interaction between octamer-binding proteins and an EC-specific factor, Fx, that bind adjacent sites on the FGF-4 enhancer. Through the cloning and characterization of an F9 cell cDNA we now show that the latter activity is Sox2, a member of the Sry-related Sox factors family. Sox2 can form a ternary complex with either the ubiquitous Oct-1 or the embryonic-specific Oct-3 protein on FGF-4 enhancer DNA sequences. However, only the Sox2/Oct-3 complex is able to promote transcriptional activation. These findings identify FGF-4 as the first known embryonic target gene for Oct-3 and for any of the Sox factors, and offer insights into the mechanisms of selective gene activation by Sox and octamer-binding proteins during embryogenesis
—
id: 56811,
year: 1995,
vol: 9,
page: 2635,
stat: Journal Article,
Interaction between a novel F9-specific factor and octamer-binding proteins is required for cell-type-restricted activity of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer
Dailey L; Yuan H; Basilico C
1994 Dec;14(12):7758-7769, Molecular & cellular biology
Understanding how diverse transcription patterns are achieved through common factor binding elements is a fundamental question that underlies much of developmental and cellular biology. One example is provided by the fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene, whose expression is restricted to specific embryonic tissues during development and to undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells in tissue culture. Analysis of the cis- and trans-acting elements required for the activity of the previously identified FGF-4 enhancer in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells showed that enhancer function depends on sequences that bind Sp1 and ubiquitous as well as F9-specific octamer-binding proteins. However, sequences immediately upstream of the octamer motif, which conform to a binding site for the high-mobility group (HMG) domain factor family, were also critical to enhancer function. We have identified a novel F9-specific factor, Fx, which specifically recognizes this motif. Fx formed complexes with either Oct-1 or Oct-3 in a template-dependent manner. The ability of different enhancer variants to form the Oct-Fx complexes correlated with enhancer activity, indicating that these complexes play an essential role in transcriptional activation of the FGF-4 gene. Thus, while FGF-4 enhancer function is octamer site dependent, its developmentally restricted activity is determined by the interaction of octamer-binding proteins with the tissue-specific factor Fx
—
id: 14411,
year: 1994,
vol: 14,
page: 7758,
stat: Journal Article,


